Gazprom says Russia has no further commitments to get the Nord Stream 1 turbine

Written by

Model of gas pipeline and Gazprom logo, July 18, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo

Sign up now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

  • This content was produced in Russia, where the law restricts coverage of Russian military operations in Ukraine

MOSCOW, July 22 (Reuters) – Russian energy giant Gazprom (GAZP.MM) said Friday the current contract with Siemens Energy (ENR1n.DE) does not require Russia to take further action to facilitate the return of a turbine to the Nord Stream 1 gas pipeline.

Nord Stream 1, which runs on the bottom of the Baltic Sea from Russia to Germany, restarted pumping gas on Thursday after 10 days of maintenance, but at only 40% of its capacity.

Gazprom cut flows in June, saying it could not get the turbine back, which had been sent to Canada for repairs. Germany, on the other hand, has said that the turbine in question was only intended to be used in September. Read more

Sign up now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

It said on Friday that the company had still not obtained the necessary documentation from Siemens Energy confirming the exemption from EU and Canadian sanctions for the turbine to be returned to the Portovaya compressor station.

On Thursday, two people with knowledge of the matter said the turbine was stuck in transit in Germany because Russia has so far not given the green light to transport it back. Read more

“Gazprom emphasized that the current terms of the contract do not give the Russian side additional obligations to procure this engine,” the Kremlin-controlled company said in a statement after it again asked Siemens Energy for the papers.

Germany rejects Russia’s argument that the missing turbine is the cause of lower supplies via Nord Stream 1, and has accused Moscow of using gas flows as a political weapon. Russia has said it was a reliable energy supplier.

Sign up now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Reporting by Reuters, editing by Louise Heavens and David Evans

Our standards: Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

About the author

Leave a Comment